The Federalist Papers by Alexander HamiltonWith all the talk in political discourse these days about what the US Founding Fathers intended, I felt it was time to go straight to the source. If youve ever had similar thoughts, this is the place to start. This work is long - around 22 hours of Librivox audio - and written in archaic, ornate English. But anyone reading it will be immediately impressed by its scholarship and depth. It also gives a clear picture of what said Founding Fathers were up against - unbridled, often unprincipled, and outright rude opposition to pretty much every last bit of the Constitution at every turn. This series of essays was painstakingly written to try and convince the country that, while the new Constitution was not and could not be perfect, it was urgently needed to get the Union government functional, and that it was perhaps the best that could be done, given an imperfect world and us imperfect humans. The writers of the new Constitution were clearly trying their utmost to create a government and society as fair, conflict-free and well-functioning as they could manage. Interesting how slaves were reluctantly counted, in a compromise with the South, as having 3/5 the personhood of a free-born man. Really, every American, and anybody interested in how power, justice, and societies work, should read this carefully. Its left me a little tired, but happy and satisfied.
Anti-Federalist Papers Summary and Analysis
I recently finished reading the Anti-Federalist Papers , which is one reason why I would like to write an Anti-Federalist Papers summary and analysis. In doing so, I managed to read through and analyze all 85 of them. While I will refrain from summarizing each one of the Anti-Federalist Papers individually, I would highly recommend that you read them all, or at least those three. They are great ones to read and very important for American political thought and development. Without them, our nation would be a very different place.
Portrait of Hamilton by John Trumbull, Wikimedia Commons Hamilton wrote the lion's share of the Federalist Papers. The framers of the Constitution have in a felicitous turn of phrase, been described as well read, well bred, and well fed. All three are correct. On September 17, , thirty-nine delegates signed the Constitution, yet ratification by the states was necessary.
In order to develop a comprehensive understanding of the American Founding, it is important to also understand the Anti-Federalist objections to the ratification of the Constitution. Among the most important of the Anti-Federalist writings are the essays of Brutus. Although it has not been definitively established, these essays are generally attributed to Robert Yates. The Brutus essays provide the most direct and compelling rebuttal of the Federalist argument. Anti-Federalist Papers: Brutus No. Assignment Read Brutus No.
The Anti-Federalist Papers is the collective name given to works written by the Founding Fathers who were opposed to or concerned with the merits of the United States Constitution of Starting on 25 September 8 days after the final draft of the US Constitution and running through the early s, these anti-Federalists published a series of essays arguing against a stronger and more energetic union as embodied in the new Constitution.
laura movie 1979 watch online
A N OBJECTION , of a nature different from that which has been stated and answered, in my last address, may perhaps be likewise urged against the principle of legislation for the individual citizens of America. It may be said that it would tend to render the government of the Union too powerful, and to enable it to absorb those residuary authorities, which it might be judged proper to leave with the States for local purposes. Allowing the utmost latitude to the love of power which any reasonable man can require, I confess I am at a loss to discover what temptation the persons intrusted with the administration of the general government could ever feel to divest the States of the authorities of that description. The regulation of the mere domestic police of a State appears to me to hold out slender allurements to ambition. Commerce, finance, negotiation, and war seem to comprehend all the objects which have charms for minds governed by that passion; and all the powers necessary to those objects ought, in the first instance, to be lodged in the national depository. The administration of private justice between the citizens of the same State, the supervision of agriculture and of other concerns of a similar nature, all those things, in short, which are proper to be provided for by local legislation, can never be desirable cares of a general jurisdiction.
Federalist No. It was published on December 5, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. Hamilton argues that because states are given the most direct power over their citizens, namely the ability to administer criminal and civil justice, they remain "the most attractive source of popular obedience and attachment". According to Hamilton, this power contributes more than any other circumstance to impressing upon the minds of the people affection, esteem, and reverence towards the government [of the state]. Furthermore, Hamilton says human nature makes it so they [the people] are more closely attached to things they are geographically near, hence a person is more attached to their neighborhood than the community at large. Therefore, "The people of each state would be apt to feel a stronger bias towards their local governments than towards the government of the union. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.